<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Personnel Files</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thepersonnelfiles.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thepersonnelfiles.com</link>
	<description>The latest developments in the law of the workplace, from the employment and labor lawyers at Zashin &#38; Rich Co., L.P.A.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 18:41:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='thepersonnelfiles.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://thepersonnelfiles.com/osd.xml" title="The Personnel Files" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://thepersonnelfiles.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Ohio Court: No Immediate Appeal from Denial of Preliminary Injunction Against Unfair Competition</title>
		<link>http://thepersonnelfiles.com/2012/02/22/ohio-court-no-immediate-appeal-from-denial-of-preliminary-injunction-against-unfair-competition/</link>
		<comments>http://thepersonnelfiles.com/2012/02/22/ohio-court-no-immediate-appeal-from-denial-of-preliminary-injunction-against-unfair-competition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 18:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Rossiter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court Procedures and Rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unfair Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[final judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interlocutory appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interlocutory appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motion for preliminary injunction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade secrets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unfair competition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepersonnelfiles.com/?p=10170722482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you sue a bunch of former sales employees for absconding with customer information and violating non-solicitation agreements, and you ask a judge to issue a &#8220;preliminary injunction&#8221; to stop those former employees in their tracks while your lawsuit is &#8230; <a href="http://thepersonnelfiles.com/2012/02/22/ohio-court-no-immediate-appeal-from-denial-of-preliminary-injunction-against-unfair-competition/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=thepersonnelfiles.com&amp;blog=27488141&amp;post=10170722482&amp;subd=zrhr&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thepersonnelfiles.com/2012/02/22/ohio-court-no-immediate-appeal-from-denial-of-preliminary-injunction-against-unfair-competition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bd71e33525f5d59e15a6e46fc4d1f01a?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jasonrossiter</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://zrhr.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/163942wfgg6yvcz.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Question Mark</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does &#8220;Manifest Disregard&#8221; Still Exist as a Grounds for Vacating an Arbitrator&#8217;s Award?</title>
		<link>http://thepersonnelfiles.com/2012/02/17/does-manifest-disregard-still-exist-as-a-grounds-for-vacating-an-arbitrators-award/</link>
		<comments>http://thepersonnelfiles.com/2012/02/17/does-manifest-disregard-still-exist-as-a-grounds-for-vacating-an-arbitrators-award/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Rossiter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manifest Disregard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepersonnelfiles.com/?p=10170722478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For as long as I can remember, courts have entertain arguments about whether or not to overturn an arbitrator&#8217;s award on the grounds the the arbitrator &#8220;manifestly disregarded&#8221; the law. Trouble is, there&#8217;s this statute out there called the Federal &#8230; <a href="http://thepersonnelfiles.com/2012/02/17/does-manifest-disregard-still-exist-as-a-grounds-for-vacating-an-arbitrators-award/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=thepersonnelfiles.com&amp;blog=27488141&amp;post=10170722478&amp;subd=zrhr&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thepersonnelfiles.com/2012/02/17/does-manifest-disregard-still-exist-as-a-grounds-for-vacating-an-arbitrators-award/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bd71e33525f5d59e15a6e46fc4d1f01a?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jasonrossiter</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strolling Into Your Opponent&#8217;s &#8220;Electronically Stored Garden&#8221;: The Production of Hard Drives in Discovery</title>
		<link>http://thepersonnelfiles.com/2012/02/08/strolling-into-your-opponents-electronically-stored-garden-the-production-of-hard-drives-in-discovery/</link>
		<comments>http://thepersonnelfiles.com/2012/02/08/strolling-into-your-opponents-electronically-stored-garden-the-production-of-hard-drives-in-discovery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Rossiter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer hard drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discovery requests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hard Disks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hard Drives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy and confidentiality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepersonnelfiles.com/?p=10170722466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Occasionally, I receive discovery requests from other lawyers who demand, as part of their initial discovery requests, that they be permitted to make &#8220;forensic&#8221; copies of my client&#8217;s computer hard drives, apparently so that they (or their experts) can examine the entire &#8230; <a href="http://thepersonnelfiles.com/2012/02/08/strolling-into-your-opponents-electronically-stored-garden-the-production-of-hard-drives-in-discovery/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=thepersonnelfiles.com&amp;blog=27488141&amp;post=10170722466&amp;subd=zrhr&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thepersonnelfiles.com/2012/02/08/strolling-into-your-opponents-electronically-stored-garden-the-production-of-hard-drives-in-discovery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bd71e33525f5d59e15a6e46fc4d1f01a?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jasonrossiter</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://zrhr.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/6847647ltc7ulbs.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">magnifying</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>6th Circuit: Federal &#8220;Edge Act&#8221; Did Not Permit Removal of Ohio Wrongful Discharge Lawsuit</title>
		<link>http://thepersonnelfiles.com/2012/02/01/6th-circuit-federal-edge-act-did-not-permit-removal-of-ohio-wrongful-discharge-lawsuit/</link>
		<comments>http://thepersonnelfiles.com/2012/02/01/6th-circuit-federal-edge-act-did-not-permit-removal-of-ohio-wrongful-discharge-lawsuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Rossiter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court Procedures and Rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisdiction and Removal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edge Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Removal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepersonnelfiles.com/?p=10170722453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ordinarily, cases involving a court&#8217;s jurisdiction aren&#8217;t terribly exciting reading. Cases involving removal jurisdiction tend to be even less exciting.  And cases involving both removal jurisdiction and foreign currency transactions can&#8230; well., ZZzzZzzzzzz. But then I saw Sollitt v. KeyCorp., &#8230; <a href="http://thepersonnelfiles.com/2012/02/01/6th-circuit-federal-edge-act-did-not-permit-removal-of-ohio-wrongful-discharge-lawsuit/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=thepersonnelfiles.com&amp;blog=27488141&amp;post=10170722453&amp;subd=zrhr&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thepersonnelfiles.com/2012/02/01/6th-circuit-federal-edge-act-did-not-permit-removal-of-ohio-wrongful-discharge-lawsuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bd71e33525f5d59e15a6e46fc4d1f01a?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jasonrossiter</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://zrhr.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/5724499u72gvu1j.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Piggy Bank</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>5th Circuit: Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable Because Employer Reserved Right to Modify It</title>
		<link>http://thepersonnelfiles.com/2012/01/26/5th-circuit-arbitration-agreement-unenforceable-because-employer-reserved-right-to-modify-it/</link>
		<comments>http://thepersonnelfiles.com/2012/01/26/5th-circuit-arbitration-agreement-unenforceable-because-employer-reserved-right-to-modify-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Rossiter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arbitration clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arbitration programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mandatory arbitration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepersonnelfiles.com/?p=10170722443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Several companies have mandatory arbitration programs, pursuant to which every employee must sign an agreement promising to submit every possible claim they might want to assert against the company to mandatory and binding arbitration. Much ink has been spilled in &#8230; <a href="http://thepersonnelfiles.com/2012/01/26/5th-circuit-arbitration-agreement-unenforceable-because-employer-reserved-right-to-modify-it/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=thepersonnelfiles.com&amp;blog=27488141&amp;post=10170722443&amp;subd=zrhr&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thepersonnelfiles.com/2012/01/26/5th-circuit-arbitration-agreement-unenforceable-because-employer-reserved-right-to-modify-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bd71e33525f5d59e15a6e46fc4d1f01a?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jasonrossiter</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://zrhr.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/52928h8fy8cpivs.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Handshake</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>NLRB Clicks &#8220;Like&#8221; Button on Two Employer Social Media Policies, Rejects Many Others</title>
		<link>http://thepersonnelfiles.com/2012/01/25/nlrb-clicks-like-button-on-two-employer-social-media-policies-rejects-many-others/</link>
		<comments>http://thepersonnelfiles.com/2012/01/25/nlrb-clicks-like-button-on-two-employer-social-media-policies-rejects-many-others/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Rossiter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NLRB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepersonnelfiles.com/?p=10170722437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lafe Solomon, Acting General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board, issued a new report yesterday describing various social media-related cases that the Board has handled during the preceding year. The report, which is 35 pages long, is interesting reading. &#8230; <a href="http://thepersonnelfiles.com/2012/01/25/nlrb-clicks-like-button-on-two-employer-social-media-policies-rejects-many-others/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=thepersonnelfiles.com&amp;blog=27488141&amp;post=10170722437&amp;subd=zrhr&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thepersonnelfiles.com/2012/01/25/nlrb-clicks-like-button-on-two-employer-social-media-policies-rejects-many-others/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bd71e33525f5d59e15a6e46fc4d1f01a?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jasonrossiter</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://zrhr.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/44686duooapukzy.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Social Media fingers</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>California Court: Recruiters Qualified for &#8220;Commissioned Salesperson&#8221; Exemption in Wage Order 7</title>
		<link>http://thepersonnelfiles.com/2012/01/24/california-court-recruiters-qualified-for-commissioned-salesperson-exemption-in-wage-order-7/</link>
		<comments>http://thepersonnelfiles.com/2012/01/24/california-court-recruiters-qualified-for-commissioned-salesperson-exemption-in-wage-order-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Rossiter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wage & Hour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commissioned salesperson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exemption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wage & hour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepersonnelfiles.com/?p=10170722430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A California Court has held that a group of recruiters qualified for California&#8217;s commissioned salesperson exemption. Here&#8217;s how the court described what these recruiters did to earn their keep: Appellants&#8217; primary job duty was to recruit &#8220;candidates&#8221; for employer &#8220;clients.&#8221; &#8230; <a href="http://thepersonnelfiles.com/2012/01/24/california-court-recruiters-qualified-for-commissioned-salesperson-exemption-in-wage-order-7/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=thepersonnelfiles.com&amp;blog=27488141&amp;post=10170722430&amp;subd=zrhr&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thepersonnelfiles.com/2012/01/24/california-court-recruiters-qualified-for-commissioned-salesperson-exemption-in-wage-order-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bd71e33525f5d59e15a6e46fc4d1f01a?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jasonrossiter</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://zrhr.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/13034fnnf0sme59.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Man on Phone</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another &#8220;Kitchen Sink&#8221; Complaint Goes Down the Drain</title>
		<link>http://thepersonnelfiles.com/2012/01/23/another-kitchen-sink-complaint-goes-down-the-drain/</link>
		<comments>http://thepersonnelfiles.com/2012/01/23/another-kitchen-sink-complaint-goes-down-the-drain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Rossiter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Race Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay Discrimination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepersonnelfiles.com/?p=10170722425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes, the likelihood of success of a lawsuit appears to be inversely proportional to the number of claims included in the complaint itself. In other words, the more causes of action that a plaintiff piles on,  the less likely that &#8230; <a href="http://thepersonnelfiles.com/2012/01/23/another-kitchen-sink-complaint-goes-down-the-drain/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=thepersonnelfiles.com&amp;blog=27488141&amp;post=10170722425&amp;subd=zrhr&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thepersonnelfiles.com/2012/01/23/another-kitchen-sink-complaint-goes-down-the-drain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bd71e33525f5d59e15a6e46fc4d1f01a?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jasonrossiter</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://zrhr.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/31263xzt355ok3f.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Drain</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>6th Circuit Affirms Plaintiff&#8217;s Verdict in FMLA Interference Claim, Remands for Doubling of Damages</title>
		<link>http://thepersonnelfiles.com/2012/01/20/6th-circuit-company-violated-fmla-by-failing-to-notify-employee-it-was-using-rolling-12-month-calculation/</link>
		<comments>http://thepersonnelfiles.com/2012/01/20/6th-circuit-company-violated-fmla-by-failing-to-notify-employee-it-was-using-rolling-12-month-calculation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Rossiter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FMLA/Leaves of Absence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fmla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rolling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepersonnelfiles.com/?p=10170722421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Sixth Circuit has affirmed a key part of a rather large FMLA judgment against an Ohio company for interfering with an employee&#8217;s FMLA rights. In the course of its opinion, the 6th Circuit held that an employer who fails &#8230; <a href="http://thepersonnelfiles.com/2012/01/20/6th-circuit-company-violated-fmla-by-failing-to-notify-employee-it-was-using-rolling-12-month-calculation/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=thepersonnelfiles.com&amp;blog=27488141&amp;post=10170722421&amp;subd=zrhr&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thepersonnelfiles.com/2012/01/20/6th-circuit-company-violated-fmla-by-failing-to-notify-employee-it-was-using-rolling-12-month-calculation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bd71e33525f5d59e15a6e46fc4d1f01a?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jasonrossiter</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://zrhr.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/285673kbi529kx9.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Paperwork</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>5th Circuit Revives Title VII Same-Sex Harassment Claim</title>
		<link>http://thepersonnelfiles.com/2012/01/20/5th-circuit-revives-title-vii-same-sex-harassment-claim/</link>
		<comments>http://thepersonnelfiles.com/2012/01/20/5th-circuit-revives-title-vii-same-sex-harassment-claim/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 19:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Rossiter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hostile Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual harassment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zrhr.wordpress.com/?p=10170722414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All Title VII sexual harassment claimants must prove (among other things) that the alleged harassment was done &#8220;because of&#8221; their sex, regardless of the genders of the various people involved. The Supreme Court told us that in Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc., 523 &#8230; <a href="http://thepersonnelfiles.com/2012/01/20/5th-circuit-revives-title-vii-same-sex-harassment-claim/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=thepersonnelfiles.com&amp;blog=27488141&amp;post=10170722414&amp;subd=zrhr&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thepersonnelfiles.com/2012/01/20/5th-circuit-revives-title-vii-same-sex-harassment-claim/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/bd71e33525f5d59e15a6e46fc4d1f01a?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jasonrossiter</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://zrhr.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/248361bzvbhaad8.jpg?w=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Man&#039;s Head</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
